
Published on June 30, 2010
"We're not seeing enough police on the streets, we're not catching enough burglars, we're not convicting enough.
Then we do, when we do convict them, they're not getting long enough sentences."
David Cameron 15/04/10
|
|
Bang goes the bobby!
I am outraged by news of potential huge cuts to the Police force and the decision by Teresa May to scrap Labour's policing pledge ,which included the promise that neighbourhood police officers spend at least 80% of their time on the beat.
The hypocrisy of this coalition astounds me! Let’s look back to the promises made in the historic first prime ministerial debate on 15 April 2010.
Jacqueline Salmon from Burnley asked the leaders “I was born and still work in Burnley, Lancashire. The town has the highest burglary rate per head of population in the entire country. What confidence can you give me that towns such as this all over the UK can be made safer places to live and work?"
In response Cameron claimed that “… the system isn't working properly now, there's no doubt about it. We're not seeing enough police on the streets, we're not catching enough burglars, we're not convicting enough. Then we do, when we do convict them, they're not getting long enough sentences.
Clegg, the PM’s partner in crime said “Jacqueline, you asked, what can we do to stop burglary happening over and over and over and over again. Two things: firstly, quite simply, more police on our streets….”
However, yesterday they scrapped the promise that neighbourhood police officers spend at least 80% of their time on the beat. Something specifically designed to combat the perception that too much time was spent 'off the beat', filling in forms.
Another part of the Policing pledge included answering 999 calls within 10 seconds and getting to emergencies inside 20 minutes...Now, exactly which part of this can we afford to scrap? Which part is bureaucratic?
Sir Hugh Orde, President of the Association of Chief Police Officers also said it was "misleading in the extreme" to claim police manpower could be maintained in the face of cuts of up to 33% facing the Home Office".
It is feared that as many as one in five officers could go, in addition to backroom staff. I thought you said “We're not seeing enough police on the streets” Mr Cameron!?
Then, today Ken Clarke criticises what he sees as a ‘bang 'em up culture’. He plans to divert thousands of offenders away from short-term prison sentences. I suspect the £4bn prison-building programme – the largest in Europe, will also be scrapped!
Perhaps Clarke missed the first TV debate when his boss said “we're not convicting enough. Then when we do convict them, they're not getting long enough sentences…”
Oh and lets not forget Cameron defending the need for short sentences when he regaled us with the story of his mother who is a magistrate “you've got to have that power for a short prison sentence when you've tried the other remedies”.
The cuts to vital frontline public services are disastrous. Under Labour, record numbers of police officers and increased prison places helped see a 37% reduction in crime…the link is obvious!
The ConDems want to paint a picture of being tough on crime….you must be joking! I fear the consequences of this hypocritical, short-sighted and irresponsible behaviour.
Read the BBC transcript of the first debate here (PDF 3.65 MB)
|